For the first time it its 73 year history the Irish Red
Cross will, during the month of May, appoint its own Chairperson. Since the
founding of the Irish Red Cross in 1939 the Irish Government has always
appointed the Chairperson.
Following the recent approval by the Government of a new
Irish Red Cross Constitution the honour of appointing the Chairperson now falls
to the governing Central Council of the Society. The obligation on the Irish
Red Cross to therefore carry out the selection and appointment process in an
open, transparent, fair and accountable manner is obvious.
How has the Irish Red Cross faired so far then? Well an organisation
steeped in a culture of secrecy, misgovernance, financial irregularities,
cronyism and misuse of donor money doesn’t change its spots easily. Despite the
appointment of a new Chairperson being only weeks away there has been no public
vacancy announcement and no information or details provided on the Irish Red
Cross website. It is not clear what, if any, application process applies and
how one can put forward suitably qualified interested candidates. Such secrecy
and lack of transparency doesn’t exactly shout to the world ‘we are committed
to change and henceforth we will amend our ways’.
The Irish Red Cross has apparently appointed a five
person insider Nominations Committee, three from the Executive Committee and
two from the Central Council, to oversee the mysterious process. The three
individuals appointed from the Executive Committee would best be described as ‘status
quo loyalists’ so the two individuals from the Central Council will have their
work cut out if they have any interest in appointing a chairperson committed to
real change. Nowhere on the Irish Red Cross website is the name of these five
individuals and their contact details revealed. The culture of secrecy
prevails.
It remains unclear if the Nominations Committee will put
forward a number of names on which Central Council members will vote at their
May Central Council meeting or if they will submit one name to be crowned on
the day.
Just to mention one of the ‘sweeping’ changes under the
new Irish Red Cross constitution is the name change of Central Council to
General Assembly. One can only imagine the dramatic impact this new name will
lead to! Those familiar with the Irish Red Cross know that the rewriting of the
constitution began over twelve years ago so it’s encouraging to see that twelve
years work has led to such fundamental change as a new name for the Central
Council.
This Blog is not a big gambling fan but if it was to put
a few Euros on who the next Chairperson of the Irish Red Cross will be the
money would be on the existing Fianna Fail appointed Chairman, David O’
Callaghan. His term of office expires on April 30th, six days from
now and he has not publicly indicated his desire to step down. This combined
with the Irish Red Cross failure to announce the vacancy and invite
applications in an open, accountable and transparent manner leads the Blog to
believe Mr. O’Callaghan wants to be given another term in office. If that is
the case the Blog has no doubt the compliant Central Council (sorry General
Assembly) will oblige and his coronation will be complete by the end of May. If
that happens long serving board members can breathe a sigh of relief as Mr. O’Callaghan
has gone out of his way to publicly praise and endorse those with the longest board
service and who would have most to lose in the event of a new reforming chair
being appointed.
Silence also surrounds the appointment of the first
National Director of Units. The closing date for applications was 31st
March 2012 so presumably an announcement should be imminent. Many comments on
the Blog have been advocating for a ‘non-insider’ female to be appointed to
break the appalling gender imbalance within the governance structures of the
Society and to put a hole in the culture of cronyism endemic to the organisation.
As mentioned above the new Irish Red Cross constitution
was approved by the Government last week. In fairness the new rules have a
number of positives and as well as many negatives. The main positive is that
despite every attempt by long serving board members to delay and minimise
governance reform strenuous lobbying by a number of individuals scuppered their
efforts. As a result there is now a maximum limit on the number of years any
individual can serve on the Executive Committee (now called the Board of
Directors, another of those sweeping changes!). This will ensure obscene
amounts of service such as Tony Lawlor’s 21 years as Vice Chair will never ever
be allowed happen again. This must be acknowledged as a big positive. It will
hopefully protect future generations of the Irish Red Cross from the damage
caused by poor governance that has been sadly inflicted on the Society over the
past twenty years. No Executive Committee member going forward will be allowed
serve more than two three year terms (six years) in office without having to
take a mandatory three year break. This will ensure no individual ever again
gets a strangle hold on the Society to the extent current long serving board
members have.
It should be remembered that those responsible for
putting forward governance reform proposals did everything to minimise this
mandatory break. The first draft constitution put forward reluctantly
recommended only a one year break. This was endorsed by the compliant and acquiescent
Central Council. Following an enormous amount of lobbying which resulted in a
letter to the Irish Red Cross from Minister for Justice and Defence, Alan
Shatter, in May 2011, the powers that be at the Society introduced a three year
‘not really mandatory’ break where one had to step down for three years after
six years service but only if someone else was nominated for the position. If no-one
else went forward for the position then an individual could serve a third three
year term, a fourth term and so on indefinitely. The compliant and acquiescent
Central Council approved this amended version. More lobbying followed and
finally the game was up for the Irish Red Cross. The clause allowing indefinite terms of
office if no-one else went forward for the position was removed. The compliant
and acquiescent Central Council approved this third attempt at proper
governance reform at its 10th March 2012 meeting. As such a three year break after six years
service on the Executive Committee is now MANDATORY with NO exceptions. This must
be acknowledged as very positive and a direct result of sustained advocacy and
lobbying.
There are a number of critical weaknesses in the new
constitution. First and foremost it does not take into account cumulative
service on the board to date. While the new constitution is clearly stating
that serving no more than six years on the Executive Committee followed by a
three year mandatory break is good practice such a philosophy will not be
applied to those excessively long serving board members such as the Vice
Chairman and Treasurer. This means that despite having already served 21 years
as Vice Chairman the current incumbent, if he is re-appointed, will be permitted
to serve for another six years before having no option but to step down from
the board. The positive is this individual will, at most, in six years time be
off the board for a minimum period of three years. The negative is we may have
to wait six years for this to happen. If, however, the Irish Red Cross
membership are sensible, prudent and genuinely committed to good governance
long serving board members will not be reappointed in May and a six year wait
for their departure will be unnecessary.
Another key weakness in the new constitution is the
absence of any maximum length of service and/or mandatory breaks for Central
Council (General Assembly) members. This means Central Council members can
effectively serve for life (indefinite three year terms) in breach of accepted
good governance practice. It is to be remembered that the Central Council is
the highest deliberative authority of the Irish Red Cross, to which the
Executive Committee reports. The failure by the Irish Red Cross leadership and
the Department of Defence to insist on mandatory breaks from Central Council
similar to that which now applies to the Executive Committee diminishes
substantially the overall standing of the new constitution.
Despite the obvious deficiencies in the new Constitution
(and only two have been referred to in this article) the mandatory three year
break from the Executive Committee with no exceptions is a significant development.
Its approval by the Government is a substantial defeat for those in the Irish
Red Cross who fought tooth and nail to prevent it ever happening. It will in
time inflict a serious blow to their power bases and henceforth they will never
again hold the same sway, power, influence and control over the Society as they
have done for the last twenty years. These individuals surely realise that
during their enforced three year absence from the Executive Committee, whether
that period commences in 2012, in 2018 or somewhere in between, that swift and
decisive moves will be made to ensure their stranglehold on the organisation is
finally broken. Should they return to the Executive Committee after their
forced three year exile they will find a changed environment, an altered
context and the influx of individuals during their absence who are prepared to
challenge them and prevent their return to dominance ever again.
Much effort and many sacrifices have been made by
numerous individuals to drag the Irish Red Cross kicking and screaming towards
reform. Those guilty of wrongdoing have yet to be held to account but their
disgraceful actions and incompetence are all now on public record and the truth
has been exposed for all to see.
Without the efforts of those committed to reform there
would be no three year mandatory break from the Executive Committee, the power
of long serving board members would not have been substantially weakened and
the suffocating hand on the throat of the Irish Red Cross would have grown
tighter not looser. Much work remains to be done but it is clear the truth,
when exposed and combined with determination, can and does force positive
change. It can be painfully slow but over time persistence pays off and will
bear fruit.
Like any good gardener will tell you the de-weeding
process never ends, you must always remain vigilant and if you want your garden
to bloom you must never stop.
The whole root,
Thick, tangled, takes a strong mind
And desire -- to make clean, make pure.
The weed, tough
As the rock it leaps against,
Unless plucked to the last
Live fiber
Will plunge up through dark again.
Lucien Stryk, 1924-The Rocks of Sesshu, And Still Birds Sing, 1998
